Government Seizes Substandard Products from Amazon and Flipkart Warehouses

BIS Intensifies Crackdown on E-commerce Majors

There seems to be no end to the troubles of Amazon and Flipkart. The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), which has intensified its crackdown on the ecommerce majors for violation of quality control orders, said geysers and sports footwear were among the items seized from the warehouses of the two companies following raids.

The ongoing regulatory challenges for Amazon and Flipkart have taken another significant turn as the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) continues its enforcement actions against the e-commerce giants. The latest crackdown specifically targets violations of quality control orders, a critical consumer protection measure in the Indian market.

The seizure of diverse products including geysers and sports footwear demonstrates the wide-ranging nature of the alleged non-compliance issues across different product categories on these platforms. These enforcement actions highlight the increasing scrutiny these e-commerce companies face regarding their responsibility for the quality and safety compliance of products sold through their marketplaces.

In a statement today, the agency said that its Delhi branch’s search and seizure operation at the warehouses of Amazon Sellers Pvt Ltd in Delhi on March 19 lasted over 15 hours.

The extensive duration of the BIS operation at Amazon’s Delhi warehouse—spanning more than 15 hours—indicates the thorough and methodical approach taken by the regulatory agency in its enforcement efforts. This prolonged inspection suggests a comprehensive examination of inventory and documentation rather than a cursory check.

The detailed nature of this operation reflects the seriousness with which the BIS is approaching compliance verification at the warehouses of major e-commerce platforms. The significant time investment in a single operation demonstrates the agency’s commitment to thorough enforcement of quality standards across India’s growing e-commerce sector.

The BIS said it seized over 3,500 products, including geysers, food mixers and other electronic products without legitimate ISI markings and with fake ISI labels. The seized products were worth INR 70 Lakh.

The seizure of more than 3,500 products represents a substantial enforcement action with significant financial implications. The discovery of items without legitimate ISI markings—and perhaps more concerningly, products bearing counterfeit ISI labels—raises serious questions about quality control processes within Amazon’s marketplace.

The range of non-compliant products, spanning from geysers to food mixers and other electronic devices, suggests that the issue may be systemic rather than isolated to a particular product category. With seized goods valued at approximately INR 70 lakh (7 million rupees), this represents a meaningful financial impact for the merchants involved and potentially for the platform itself.

In the case of Flipkart, the BIS raided its subsidiary Instakart Services Pvt Ltd’s warehouse in Delhi’s Trinagar. The operation led the body to discover about 590 sports footwear packed without ISI marks and date of manufacturing. The value of the said shoes was around INR 6 Lakh.

The BIS action against Flipkart’s subsidiary, Instakart Services Pvt Ltd, resulted in the discovery of non-compliant sports footwear lacking required ISI markings and manufacturing date information. Though smaller in volume compared to the Amazon seizure, with approximately 590 items discovered, the action still represents a significant regulatory intervention.

The identification of sports footwear specifically highlights how the enforcement focus spans across different product segments and price points in the e-commerce ecosystem. The valuation of these seized goods at around INR 6 lakh demonstrates that even at this smaller scale, the financial implications of non-compliance are substantial.

“These raids are part of the BIS’ ongoing efforts to enforce compliance with quality standards for consumer protection. Currently, there are 769 products notified for compulsory certification by various regulators, and line ministries of the Govt of India,” the statement added.

The BIS has explicitly framed these enforcement actions within the broader context of consumer protection, emphasizing that the primary motivation is ensuring that products sold to Indian consumers meet established quality standards. This positioning is important for understanding the regulatory intent behind these high-profile actions.

The statement’s reference to 769 products currently requiring compulsory certification underscores the extensive regulatory framework that e-commerce platforms must navigate. This large number of regulated products across various categories creates a complex compliance landscape that platforms and their sellers must successfully manage to remain within regulatory boundaries.

Escalating Regulatory Pressure

The BIS’ action against the ecommerce giants has gained steam in March as the aforementioned raids were the third instance of it conducting such an operation over the past few weeks.

The acceleration of enforcement activity in March, with this being the third significant operation in a short timeframe, indicates an intensification of regulatory pressure on major ecommerce platforms. This pattern suggests a coordinated and strategic enforcement campaign rather than isolated or random inspections.

The increasing frequency of these operations may signal the BIS’s determination to ensure comprehensive compliance across the ecommerce sector, potentially establishing new expectations for how platforms manage quality control and regulatory compliance for products sold through their marketplaces.

After conducting similar operations in their warehouses located in Lucknow, Gurugram and Delhi on March 7, the body raided Amazon and Flipkart’s warehouses in Tamil Nadu last week.

The geographic spread of these enforcement actions—spanning from northern India (Lucknow, Gurugram, and Delhi) to the southern state of Tamil Nadu—demonstrates the nationwide scope of the BIS’s enforcement campaign. This broad geographic focus suggests a systematic approach to compliance verification across the companies’ national distribution networks.

The short interval between these operations, with multiple raids occurring within the same month, indicates an intensified regulatory focus that may reflect either escalating concerns about compliance or a strategic decision to apply consistent pressure across multiple facilities simultaneously.

While the companies are seeing intense action from the BIS, they are also under the lens of the Competition Commission of India (CCI). The competition watchdog has found the duo guilty of abusing their dominant position in the e-commerce market by giving preference to certain sellers on their platforms.

Beyond the product quality and safety concerns being addressed by the BIS, Amazon and Flipkart face parallel regulatory challenges from the Competition Commission of India. The CCI’s finding that these companies have abused their dominant market position by preferential treatment of select sellers adds another significant dimension to their regulatory challenges.

This convergence of regulatory pressures—from both product quality enforcement and competition regulation—creates a complex compliance environment for these ecommerce platforms. The companies must simultaneously address multiple regulatory concerns that touch on different aspects of their business models and operational practices.

Earlier, the Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) alleged that the e-commerce majors were bypassing regulations by using proxy sellers to dominate listings and manipulate prices.

The involvement of the Confederation of All India Traders in raising concerns about the e-commerce majors adds a significant stakeholder voice to the regulatory conversation. CAIT’s specific allegations regarding the use of proxy sellers to manipulate marketplace dynamics point to complex structural issues beyond simple product compliance matters.

These allegations from a major trade association highlight how the regulatory challenges facing Amazon and Flipkart extend beyond government enforcement to include concerns from traditional retail competitors and other market participants. This multi-faceted pressure from both regulatory bodies and industry stakeholders creates a challenging business environment for these e-commerce platforms in the Indian market.

Also read – Jindal Stainless Invests ₹154 Crore For 9.62% Stake In M1xchange